Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.
Identifieur interne : 000405 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000404; suivant : 000406Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.
Auteurs : Enno Stürenburg [Allemagne] ; Ralf JunkerSource :
- Deutsches Arzteblatt international [ 1866-0452 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Allemagne (MeSH), Chromatographie (instrumentation), Chromatographie (tendances), Dosage immunologique (instrumentation), Dosage immunologique (tendances), Internationalité (MeSH), Systèmes automatisés lit malade (tendances), Techniques microbiologiques (instrumentation), Techniques microbiologiques (tendances), Trousses de réactifs pour diagnostic (tendances).
- MESH :
- Wicri :
- geographic : Allemagne.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Chromatography (instrumentation), Chromatography (trends), Germany (MeSH), Immunoassay (instrumentation), Immunoassay (trends), Internationality (MeSH), Microbiological Techniques (instrumentation), Microbiological Techniques (trends), Point-of-Care Systems (trends), Reagent Kits, Diagnostic (trends).
- MESH :
- chemical , trends : Reagent Kits, Diagnostic.
- geographic : Germany.
- instrumentation : Chromatography, Immunoassay, Microbiological Techniques.
- trends : Chromatography, Immunoassay, Microbiological Techniques, Point-of-Care Systems.
- Internationality.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Point-of-care testing (POCT) for the demonstration of pathogens was introduced several years ago. The present study describes the current technical status of POCT, giving some examples, and summarizes the specific advantages and disadvantages of the POCT approach in microbiology.
METHODS
Selective review of the literature found in medical databases under consideration of current German and international guidelines.
RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS
The test systems available today are technically mature and offer good to very good performance. For HIV, malaria, group A streptococci, and legionellae, POCT testing, when indicated, is on a par with conventional procedures. The information yielded by rapid tests for pneumococci and for influenza tends to be supplementary in nature. The rapid test for group B streptococci is unsuitable for routine use because its sensitivity is still too low compared with bacterial culture. POCT can be successful only if the tests are performed correctly by trained personnel, quality management procedures are followed, and the severity of illness and the epidemiological circumstances are taken into account when interpreting the results.
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0048
PubMed: 19564967
PubMed Central: PMC2695304
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.</title><author><name sortKey="Sturenburg, Enno" sort="Sturenburg, Enno" uniqKey="Sturenburg E" first="Enno" last="Stürenburg">Enno Stürenburg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>LADR GmbH, MVZ Geesthacht-Labor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. stuerenburg@ladr.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>LADR GmbH, MVZ Geesthacht-Labor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502 Geesthacht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Junker, Ralf" sort="Junker, Ralf" uniqKey="Junker R" first="Ralf" last="Junker">Ralf Junker</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19564967</idno><idno type="pmid">19564967</idno><idno type="doi">10.3238/arztebl.2009.0048</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC2695304</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000407</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000407</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000407</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000407</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000407</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.</title><author><name sortKey="Sturenburg, Enno" sort="Sturenburg, Enno" uniqKey="Sturenburg E" first="Enno" last="Stürenburg">Enno Stürenburg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>LADR GmbH, MVZ Geesthacht-Labor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. stuerenburg@ladr.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>LADR GmbH, MVZ Geesthacht-Labor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502 Geesthacht</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>21502 Geesthacht</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Junker, Ralf" sort="Junker, Ralf" uniqKey="Junker R" first="Ralf" last="Junker">Ralf Junker</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Deutsches Arzteblatt international</title><idno type="eISSN">1866-0452</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromatography (instrumentation)</term><term>Chromatography (trends)</term><term>Germany (MeSH)</term><term>Immunoassay (instrumentation)</term><term>Immunoassay (trends)</term><term>Internationality (MeSH)</term><term>Microbiological Techniques (instrumentation)</term><term>Microbiological Techniques (trends)</term><term>Point-of-Care Systems (trends)</term><term>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic (trends)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne (MeSH)</term><term>Chromatographie (instrumentation)</term><term>Chromatographie (tendances)</term><term>Dosage immunologique (instrumentation)</term><term>Dosage immunologique (tendances)</term><term>Internationalité (MeSH)</term><term>Systèmes automatisés lit malade (tendances)</term><term>Techniques microbiologiques (instrumentation)</term><term>Techniques microbiologiques (tendances)</term><term>Trousses de réactifs pour diagnostic (tendances)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="trends" xml:lang="en"><term>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Germany</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromatography</term><term>Immunoassay</term><term>Microbiological Techniques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="tendances" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chromatographie</term><term>Dosage immunologique</term><term>Systèmes automatisés lit malade</term><term>Techniques microbiologiques</term><term>Trousses de réactifs pour diagnostic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="trends" xml:lang="en"><term>Chromatography</term><term>Immunoassay</term><term>Microbiological Techniques</term><term>Point-of-Care Systems</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Internationality</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne</term><term>Internationalité</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Point-of-care testing (POCT) for the demonstration of pathogens was introduced several years ago. The present study describes the current technical status of POCT, giving some examples, and summarizes the specific advantages and disadvantages of the POCT approach in microbiology.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Selective review of the literature found in medical databases under consideration of current German and international guidelines.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>The test systems available today are technically mature and offer good to very good performance. For HIV, malaria, group A streptococci, and legionellae, POCT testing, when indicated, is on a par with conventional procedures. The information yielded by rapid tests for pneumococci and for influenza tends to be supplementary in nature. The rapid test for group B streptococci is unsuitable for routine use because its sensitivity is still too low compared with bacterial culture. POCT can be successful only if the tests are performed correctly by trained personnel, quality management procedures are followed, and the severity of illness and the epidemiological circumstances are taken into account when interpreting the results.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19564967</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1866-0452</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>106</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Deutsches Arzteblatt international</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Dtsch Arztebl Int</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>48-54</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3238/arztebl.2009.0048</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Point-of-care testing (POCT) for the demonstration of pathogens was introduced several years ago. The present study describes the current technical status of POCT, giving some examples, and summarizes the specific advantages and disadvantages of the POCT approach in microbiology.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Selective review of the literature found in medical databases under consideration of current German and international guidelines.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The test systems available today are technically mature and offer good to very good performance. For HIV, malaria, group A streptococci, and legionellae, POCT testing, when indicated, is on a par with conventional procedures. The information yielded by rapid tests for pneumococci and for influenza tends to be supplementary in nature. The rapid test for group B streptococci is unsuitable for routine use because its sensitivity is still too low compared with bacterial culture. POCT can be successful only if the tests are performed correctly by trained personnel, quality management procedures are followed, and the severity of illness and the epidemiological circumstances are taken into account when interpreting the results.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stürenburg</LastName><ForeName>Enno</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>LADR GmbH, MVZ Geesthacht-Labor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. stuerenburg@ladr.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Junker</LastName><ForeName>Ralf</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>23</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Dtsch Arztebl Int</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101475967</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1866-0452</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011933">Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002845" MajorTopicYN="N">Chromatography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005858" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Germany</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007118" MajorTopicYN="N">Immunoassay</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D038622" MajorTopicYN="N">Internationality</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008828" MajorTopicYN="N">Microbiological Techniques</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="N">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019095" MajorTopicYN="N">Point-of-Care Systems</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011933" MajorTopicYN="N">Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><NumberOfReferences>37</NumberOfReferences><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">diagnosis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">immune diagnosis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">infection risk</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">laboratory diagnosis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">rapid testing</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2008</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>12</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19564967</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3238/arztebl.2009.0048</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2695304</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):347-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10987697</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Nov 9;50(RR-19):1-57; quiz CE1-19a1-CE6-19a1</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11718472</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jan;15(1):66-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11781267</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Dec 1;37(11):1405-33</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14614663</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jan 15;38(2):222-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14699454</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1597042</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Jan;134 Suppl 1:S40-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19172555</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Mar 27;47(11):211-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9551881</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6):e77</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10353974</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pneumologie. 2005 Sep;59(9):612-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16170727</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):1055-66</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16585299</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16625125</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Sep 22;55(RR-14):1-17; quiz CE1-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16988643</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996 May 31;45(RR-7):1-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8637497</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Junker, Ralf" sort="Junker, Ralf" uniqKey="Junker R" first="Ralf" last="Junker">Ralf Junker</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Sturenburg, Enno" sort="Sturenburg, Enno" uniqKey="Sturenburg E" first="Enno" last="Stürenburg">Enno Stürenburg</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeAllemagneV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000405 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000405 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeAllemagneV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19564967
|texte= Point-of-care testing in microbiology: the advantages and disadvantages of immunochromatographic test strips.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19564967" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeAllemagneV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |